Friday, December 2, 2011

Marilyn Monroe and feminism


A book preview & presentation by Professor Lois Banner
“Where is the love?” part of the series of lectures by Barbara Streisand Foundation, Intersection of love, money and power between man and women in the US


          
              The speaker, Professor Lois Banner, USC department of Genders Studies is an accomplished scholar, and well-known, very much loved teacher at USC. Banner is the First woman president of American Studies Association, Fellow of the Rockefeller Foundation, and the author of 6 books. Her 7th book is going to be published in the summer of 2012, and that is the biography of Marilyn Monroe, inspiration for the lecture.
              The lecture, based on the book that gives an intimate look into Marilyn Monroe’s life, and it sheds considerable light on difficulties that women like Monroe face, especially relationships between love/romance and rationing of their career. It also shows how their romantic relationships influence decisions and life they choose for themselves. It is a complex subject and difficult territory to analyze, but Professor Louis Banner was able to go into depth and interpret these relationships looking closely into Monroe’s life and career.

                                                           
              Professor focused her presentation on pictures and not scenes from Monroe’s movies because the public is more likely to be unfamiliar with photographic traditions on Monroe, and more familiar of her from the movies, but as Banner says, “those are two different Marilyns”.
             The actress died in August of 1964, in the age of 36 and she has remained as a icon of American culture until today. A multitude of books were written about her, major artists have done paintings and artworks inspired by her, contemporary pop stars have taken ideas and images from her. In 2012 it will be the 50th anniversary of her death. 


The purpose of the book, says Banner, is “to show Merlyn as a real human being, living a real life, managing a business, dealing with friends and associates.” Banner wanted to sweep away mystery of her being “hugely sexualized creature which are both true and untrue”, as Professor Banner says.
             She wanted to write about Marilyn Monroe because Banner was one of the founders of Women’s History and a leader in Second Wave Feminism, she wrote biographies of women who were feminists like for example, Margaret Mead or Roth Benedict. With advent of the third wave feminism as younger feminists emerged and began to criticize the previous generation for calling sexualized women “objects of male desire and not seeing their contribution to creating their sexuality in the way they could attain their sexuality through power” Banner simply wanted to write about that using a historical figure like Marilyn Monroe. The book contains 10 years of research, over hundred interviews, large amount of public archives and manuscripts. She concluded that Monroe lived most complicated life, she took many paths and turns, and because of the complexity of her life the research on this topic comes to life as successful simply because the actress was the perfect figure to be representing the issue in question.
               Marilyn Monroe was born as Norma Jean Baker in 1926. After spending much of her childhood in foster homes, she began her a career as a pin up model, which led to a film contract with 20th Century Fox in 1946 when she changed her name to Marilyn Monroe.

               Hardships she endured during her childhood, like being placed from one forester home to another impacted later her career. She was abused as a child while she lived in some of those foster homes and her mother was diagnosed with a mental disorder when Monroe was only eight years old. Monroe married early, became a pinup model, divorced, then signed with 20th Century Fox and moved to Hollywood.
              “Contrary to a common belief that she was a dumb blonde bombshell, she was astute, determined, intelligent, energetic and perfectionist”, explains Banner. She fought hard to the heights of Hollywood fame, using every technique and every path she could think of conquering her own fears and multiple disabilities to do so. She didn’t like talking about her real disabilities, because in many ways she was a private person. Monroe was a bipolar, dyslexic, insomniac, and she also stuttered. She hid and controlled her disabilities well but that was very difficult to do because she was constantly in the public eye. She became addicted to prescription drugs, which were widely prescribed to the general public at that time. She took them to go to sleep, and then she would take another up-mood kind to keep alert during the day. “From a perspective of personal ills she was a survivor and not a victim,” says Banner, “who created the roles she played weather on the screen or in real life with intelligence and skill.”

             She further adds there was in fact “many Merilyns”, however surprising this may sound. There was an “Intellectual Merlyn, who red widely in the worlds great literature and self educating herself.”  There was also a Spiritual Marilyn, who studied mystical texts. She was openly anti racist, and she dated black men. She was also sexy, party girl who did enjoy that kind of lifestyle early in her Hollywood career. To many critics and people who got to know her, she was endlessly fascinating and eccentric, full of original observations and there “wasn’t a conventional bone in her body” says Banner.

            Then there was a Radical Marilyn, who appreciated her roots and the working class and called herself a working class girl. Towards the end of her life, she became a supporter of Fidel Castro and even of the Chinese Communist who were ending, what she thought, “a century of hierarchical government” tells Banner. She believed in democracy and egalitarianism of the people of all races, backgrounds and color. More over, she was a pioneer in sexual revolution in which challenged censorship codes in Hollywood. She simply wanted to free the body from constraints. 

She was mature, innocent, sad and joyful, all at the same time. Men were very much drawn to her. It was said that, “No man could resist her.” She never refused an interview or a photo, and had a great sense of humor.  Her friends loved her, and she was known to make up most of her jokes, for which she was famous for in Hollywood circles.
            The culture of the pinup model changed during the WWII, it became more mainstream, and the girls in the photos had a specific look: large hips and breasts, but innocent face. She fit these criteria perfectly and Merlyn became the greatest pinup model of the 20th century.

             She was a natural brunette dying her hair blond, which appealed to men, and had a plastic surgery to remove her facial imperfections. Later she posed nude, and her photo became the first centerfold in the first addition of the Playboy magazine published in December of 1953. She emerges as a mainstream icon of the US culture becoming very bold and sassy Merlyn, who is looking for fame through her sexuality. She made her own bikinis that were only popular in beaches France and nobody was wearing them in the States except Merlyn. “She was brave and bold, and wanted to make a statement,” tells Banner.

          Monroe was very much commodified after the nude photograph started to circulate. They posted her photo on playing cards, posters, caps, cans, cocktail trays, etc. She knew how to use her knowledge, charm and “second sense” to get ahead. One of her tactics to attract attention was not to wear her underclothes, which was very shocking and fascinating in 1950s. She came up with a concept of slightly open mouth and half lid eyes to become her signature look. However this look was very much sexualized, she was always dignified Merlyn and she never looked vulgar.
         Monroe also became famous as a glamour model, and as a Hollywood starlet that always stands out among other starlets of her time. She was famous for wearing white, for the reason of displaying innocence, but also to stand out in a black and white photograph. Later, she used high fashion photographers to photograph her in a different way and posed for glamorous magazines to get away from her over sexualized image. One of the most famous photographs of that time was a “Ballerina”.

         She became a brilliant actress who learned to act from many acclaimed acting teachers of that time, including Michael Checkof. “The Dumb Blonde” is a very complicated image in the American Theatre, says Banner, and do not underestimate it. She was the “Great Clown” showing complexities of joy and sadness in her eyes in numerous roles she played in her films. Her fame did not come easily because she was fired numerous times by the major film studios in Hollywood, but Monroe just kept going and made it to stardom within three years.
         In many ways she was also conventional, and as much as she wanted to be a Hollywood star as a young girl, she also wanted to become a wife and a mother – 1950s convention. She married several times but died single with no one by her side.
        There has been much speculation about Marilyn Monroe's death and the causes of it. Many have suggested that it was highly unlikely she committed suicide but perhaps accidentally took an overdose of drugs.

         I very much wanted to see this other Marilyn Professor Banner intended to present, and yes, I agree she’s had a difficult and complicated life; I can see this strong, resilient person that would do anything to succeeded. And I very much wanted to become a fan, but I could not agree with the way she was objectified, commodified and constantly commercialized during her short life. I believe that she was an intelligent, ambitious young woman who knew what she wanted and would have done anything to get it, but choices she made did not necessarily display those characteristics and qualities. Although, I may not agree with Monroe’s ways or paths she chose to became famous, and her ways to the top may have not been a conventional, based on her talent, I still believe that women like her made things possible for other generations of young feminists to explore their sexuality and openness, and break the barriers of conservatism and oppression previously endured for centuries. She is no doubt a great contributor.
          Also, Monroe was a visual image of innocence and sex-appeal at the same time that very much appealed to men, so she set the path to female generations to come who get to use their sexuality to reach their dreams if that is their path of preference.
         We could blame Marilyn for setting the stage for women to be seen as commodified sex objects in our every day media until today, but she played an important role in a feminist movement and contributed to the second generation feminism. 

Thursday, December 1, 2011

I think you should all see this video. Zach Wahls is an amazing speaker and his story is very inspirational. Here is the information about the video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSQQK2Vuf9Q

Zach Wahls, a 19-year-old University of Iowa student spoke about the strength of his family during a public forum on House Joint Resolution 6 in the Iowa House of Representatives. Wahls has two mothers, and came to oppose House Joint Resolution 6 which would end civil unions in Iowa.

The fight to to keep marriage equality in Iowa continues, help us support Iowans like Zach.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Week 11 Reading on Judith Butler

In this article, Judith Butler questions the idea of theorizing homosexuality and categorizing identity. She says “identity categories tend to be instruments of regulatory regimes, whether as the normalizing categories of oppressive structures or as the rallying points for a liberatory contestation of that very oppression.” She does not completely disagree with the idea of categories but raises the question of what their purpose may be, and whether having these categories allows for any sort of individuality.
At another place she says “I’m permanently troubled by identity categories” explaining that these distinctions seek to control, rather than liberate, the people that may identify with these labels. 
She also does not understand the meaning of “theory” in context of gay/lesbian theory because she believes that this term is used by those looking to establish themselves and authenticate gay/lesbian studies within “the academy” as she puts it.
An important point Butler makes is whether sexuality can remain such once it falls prey to these labels. She wonders what is common between lesbians, and criticizes the idea of ‘coming out.’ According to her, ‘coming out’ would mean fighting some sort of oppression, or admitting to something. She also asks what exactly you are “coming into,” and whether it is just another opaque realm with little room for individuality.
“Why is it that the category becomes the site of this ethical choice” she asks.
Following up these claims, she presents her personal experiences and struggles with these identity categories that better illustrate her beliefs.
Butler also analyzes the dofferent psychoanalytic explanations for identification. She addresses the theories of Borch-Jacobsen and Ruth Leys in particular, who say that identity is that which is ‘other to itself.” What this means is that distinction of self/other is not just external but they are intertwined; the self is defined through the other. Finally, Butler says that heterosexuality often presumes gender to be implied through sex; however, acknowledging that sexuality may often work against identity and sex is a necessary step in understanding its implications for each individual.

Following a controversial Pregnancy

This article talks about the most controversial pregnancy - that of a man. Interesting insight.
http://www.inthenews.co.uk/infocus/entertainment/tv/cutting-edge-the-world-s-first-pregnant-man-$1252762.htm

Why we blame women?

This is a link to a blog I found interesting.
Why do we always blame other women instead of men? This is some good insight.

http://thereal-talk.blogspot.com/2011/06/why-do-we-always-blame-other-woman.html

Week 15 Blog

I just saw this new Barbie commercial and thought I would post it here for others to see/react to as well...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jU_1rjuNGb8&feature=youtu.be
The ad is set up in a way leading to the assumption that it will end in a statement about "thanking your mom," sister, or even a teacher-- but no...all of these girls are actually inspired by a doll ("because, really, a doll can believe in you," as one of the youtube comments say). Other viewers sarcastically mock the lines delivered in the ad with comments like "She gives me a body shape complex! And an eating disorder. I can be anything!"
Is it fair to be disturbed by this commercial, or are audiences over-reacting? 

Week 15 Blog

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/parents-keep-child-gender-under-wraps-170824245.html

This is an interesting article that looks at parents who have decide to keep their new child's sex hidden from the world. They say they believe that parents have too much influence and pressure already on a child and they want their kid, Storm, to decide what it (for lack of a better word) is. The pair already let their two sons dress however they like and decide how long or short to have their hair in an attempt to not hold their children to gender restrictions. What do you think about this choice after reading this article? Are they on the right track? Are they going too far? Will this act end up helping or hurting the child?